The grammar of work is breaking. For two centuries the question “what do you do?” had a stable answer, a job title that told a stranger roughly what you spent your days on and what you were worth. Automation of execution is loosening that link, and the loosening is arriving faster than our language for it.
In this essay, our co-founder Joseph Terry argues that the answer to the question is shifting from what we produce to what we are for, and that institutions which keep hiring, training, and evaluating people by the old grammar will misread the moment.